QUOTE (acider @ Dec 23 2008, 04:48 AM)

I think it will be...
Xeon 3060 SATA with 250GB HDD, 2GB RAM, 2000GB BW, $152
VS
Dual Xeon 3.2 SCSI with 2 x 73GB HDD (10k RPM), 2GB RAM, 2500GB BW, $135
____________________
Is the Xeon 3060 really that fast? By how much? What are its strengths over the Dual Xeon 3.2?
Based on the performance of the two processors in benchmark tests the Xeon 3060 SATA performs better than the Dual Xeon 3.2 processor-wise by a little more than 32%.
The speed between cores is typically faster than speed between processors so in most cases a single dual core server performs better than a dual single core server and a single quad core server would perform better than a dual dual core server. Also multi-core processors usually have more cache and a faster front side bus than single core processors and tend to use newer hardware in terms of the drives and RAM.
The Dual Xeon you mentioned includes 2x 73GB SCSI drives though which are 10k RPM drives, whereas the SATA drive with the 3060 has a speed of 7.2k RPM. You may want to change that to a 146GB 10k RPM SAS drive for a faster drive performance.
If you have any other questions or would like to proceed with an order, please feel free to contact me directly. You can reach me by email at bkyle @ theplanet.com or by phone at 281-714-3127. Or, you can just ask for me in chat from theplanet.com.