littlemonkey
Oct 22 2008, 06:15 PM
Just got our virtual rack servers, the bandwidth between them is not counted towards the bandwidth quote correct?
Theres no special local IPs for this purpose, I just use the public IPs for MySQL connection from one server to the other?
Thanks
Tomy Durden
Oct 23 2008, 12:00 PM
Any traffic going through the public switch will be counted. Our sales group can give you the information on backend switches which will allow traffic to flow between the servers.
Jeff
Nov 11 2008, 12:41 PM
So with the virtual rack servers you get a private IP for each virtual rack server to send traffic server to server within the virtual rack for free?
Tomy Durden
Nov 11 2008, 01:25 PM
QUOTE (Jeff @ Nov 11 2008, 12:41 PM)

So with the virtual rack servers you get a private IP for each virtual rack server to send traffic server to server within the virtual rack for free?
You can set an IP address(10.*, 192.*) but it won't route out of the VLAN that the private rack is on. If this is done via the front end switch port, the bandwidth polling servers will count it towards the pool because all traffic is counted bit by bit.
If it's done on an add-on backend switch or (legacy) cross connect, then it won't be counted towards the front end traffic.
Jeff
Nov 15 2008, 01:22 AM
I took the third bullet point at
https://www.theplanet.com/servers/pr/ QUOTE
Virtual Racks ... Unlimited server to server data transfer
to imply that server to server transfer was via a private network as one of the advantages of the virtual rack servers. Now that I think about it, I suppose unlimited does not mean unmetered -- "limited by your finances only" might be more accurate than "unlmiited" if it is truely metered by default though.
Edit:
http://www.theplanet.com/dedicated-servers/private-racks/ actually says more:
QUOTE
Unlimited Server-to-Server Transfer
– Multiple servers within the same dedicated or virtual private rack solution have dedicated and unlimited connectivity so you don't have to pay for bandwidth between your servers.
so unlimited here does seem to be used to mean unmetered...
eth00
Nov 17 2008, 08:22 AM
My understanding, at least the way it was done at one time, was that you were only billed for what actually left the switch on the uplink port. If the traffic did not go out the uplink port you were not billed for it. I guess the policy may have changed sometime? I would have to check but I am pretty sure we have a few clients using a lot of server <-> server BW without being charged. I wonder if this is just because they are legacy?
beet
Jan 29 2009, 04:07 AM
What if I have 3 servers all connected to a back-end private network (in a private rack), am I not charged for connecting to the other servers ACTUAL IPs?
ie. web server IP 67.15.111.x and 67.15.111.x communicating back and forth. I don't have 129.0.x.x or 10.0.x.x IPs setup and just connect to the actual IP of the servers at the moment.
The bandwidth charts in Orbit are showing my inter-server transfer based on the above configuration.
AaronC
Jan 29 2009, 03:19 PM
When you have a private rack and your servers are communicating over the public switch, some of the broadcast traffic still travels over the uplink port. That small about of data transfer will count towards your bandwidth transfer limits.
In a virtual rack, and data transfer over the server uplink to the switch will count towards the bandwidth transfer limit for that server (or bandwidth pool). The only way to utilize the "unlimited server to server traffic" is to assign private IPs to the secondary network interfaces and communicate over the private back-end VLAN.
ChuFuong
Feb 13 2009, 10:21 AM
internal bandwidth is still bandwidth to most companies I believe. They have no local connections setup unless it's a special case, but I've never witnessed it.
AdronW
Jun 30 2009, 03:55 PM
For virtual private racks you can setup your servers to communicate with each other on private IP's. That means they will not communicate over the public switch and you do not have the bandwidth counted against you. Virtual Private Racks or vipr as we call it internally is the way to go in almost every instance.
ajz4221
Jun 30 2009, 08:12 PM
Can a block of public IP addresses be allocated to the entire rack and then distrubuted among the servers in the rack at our choosing?
AdronW
Jul 1 2009, 08:18 AM
QUOTE (ajz4221 @ Jun 30 2009, 09:12 PM)

Can a block of public IP addresses be allocated to the entire rack and then distrubuted among the servers in the rack at our choosing?
In Virtual Private Racks you can port IP's. It works best when you order additional IP's after the server/s are online so they are not attached/bound to that server. For the record it can be done with the original order however it requires some extra work and a pre-sale note that the IP's should be portable. If the proper steps are not taken before the IP's are assigned we may not be able to assist you. Moving IP's from server to server is a standard practice with private racks.
Tomy Durden
Jul 1 2009, 08:22 AM
Also, anytime you move IPs between servers, let us know so we're not looking at the wrong servers in case you need some support.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.