James
Mar 9 2006, 05:54 AM
I'm looking at getting a cluster from ev1, what I am wondering is, what do you think is best to have? 2, 2.4 ghz celerons with different sites on each running seperately as I have already or - a 1.3 ghz cluster with the sites of 2 servers (still wont be overloaded, about 150 max) on... This will give each site better redundancy while having slightly less resources in terms of cpu I'm assuming... whats the gernal throughts on that? price difference is only about $40 more for the cluster.
AaronC
Mar 9 2006, 09:47 AM
James,
Currently we are out of the 1.3 Celeron load balanced pairs, so you will want to factor that into your decision making.
James
Mar 9 2006, 11:14 AM
Any idea when you'll be setting more up?
AaronC
Mar 9 2006, 02:03 PM
It may not be for awhile, for now assume that they are unavailable.
We could look into a pair of Celeron 2.0 servers in a load balanced pair for $258/month.
paulius
Mar 9 2006, 08:23 PM
I would highly recommend setting the money on the Pentium 4 machines.
Celerons were budget CPUs made for basic computing. They do not perform well and Pentium 4 machines will give you way more performance for your money and will allow you to do more.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.