![]() ![]() |
Sep 10 2008, 06:32 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Fellow ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 179 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Republic of Boulder Member No.: 42,528 |
So I noticed a number of things running slow on a couple of long-time servers. Load factor was minimal and no major changes on the machines. In the past, this has been indicative of DNS resolving problems.
They are located in Dllstx4 and I confirmed I'm using 67.19.{0,1}.10 in /etc/resolv.conf per Tony's post However, if I do an "dig www.cnn.com", I get ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> www.cnn.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached I try this a couple of times, and I'll occasionally get a response ... but not the nornal snappy return. Sounds a lot like this previously reported problem which seems to crop up every couple of months. Please also see Ticket #4257416PLNT for a previous instance of this (with resolution from Planet'ers) and I have filed ticket 5113370PLNT for the current problem. Thanks in advance for looking into and suspect there must be some root cause issue here ... alek |
|
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 07:33 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
SuperGeek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,393 Joined: 18-November 05 From: Lake Michigan Member No.: 18,911 |
Seeing the same thing here
dig cnn.com ; <<>> DiG 9.3.4-P1 <<>> cnn.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached Added a resolver from one of the other datacenters as a temporary quick fix. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 10 2008, 08:35 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Fellow ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 179 Joined: 30-January 05 From: Republic of Boulder Member No.: 42,528 |
Quick response on the ticket ... with advice being to use a name server from Level 3, AT&T, etc.
While that works, shouldn't we be able to use the Planet's nameservers ... and what was up with the 67.19.{0,1}.10 machines ... again, this problem crops up every once in a while. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2008, 09:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
SuperGeek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,393 Joined: 18-November 05 From: Lake Michigan Member No.: 18,911 |
Are the resolvers listed in resolv.conf used in order or randomly?
I never really thought about using out-of-datacenter dns servers due to slightly increased latency, but it would be nice if we could specify them as failover resolvers, though I would have thought that using one of the other pairs would be faster than going all the way to L3/ATT resolvers... -------------------- |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 11:10 PM |